I Borgia (The Borgias: The Hidden History), G. J. Meyer

« Older   Newer »
 
  Share  
.
  1.  
    .
    Avatar

    Senior Member

    Group
    pope
    Posts
    37,198

    Status
    Anonymous

    514_Bg_OM2_w_L_AA258_PIkin4_Bottom_Right_41_22_AA2

    CITAZIONE
    The startling truth behind one of the most notorious dynasties in history is revealed in a remarkable new account by the acclaimed author of The Tudors and A World Undone. Sweeping aside the gossip, slander, and distortion that have shrouded the Borgias for centuries, G. J. Meyer offers an unprecedented portrait of the infamous Renaissance family and their storied milieu.

    THE BORGIAS

    They burst out of obscurity in Spain not only to capture the great prize of the papacy, but to do so twice. Throughout a tumultuous half-century—as popes, statesmen, warriors, lovers, and breathtakingly ambitious political adventurers—they held center stage in the glorious and blood-drenched pageant known to us as the Italian Renaissance, standing at the epicenter of the power games in which Europe’s kings and Italy’s warlords gambled for life-and-death stakes.

    Five centuries after their fall—a fall even more sudden than their rise to the heights of power—they remain immutable symbols of the depths to which humanity can descend: Rodrigo, the Borgia who bought the papal crown and prostituted the Roman Church; Cesare, the Borgia who became first a teenage cardinal and then the most treacherous cutthroat of a violent time; Lucrezia, the Borgia as shockingly immoral as she was beautiful. These have long been stock figures in the dark chronicle of European villainy, their name synonymous with unspeakable evil.

    But did these Borgias of legend actually exist? Grounding his narrative in exhaustive research and drawing from rarely examined key sources, Meyer brings fascinating new insight to the real people within the age-encrusted myth. Equally illuminating is the light he shines on the brilliant circles in which the Borgias moved and the thrilling era they helped to shape, a time of wars and political convulsions that reverberate to the present day, when Western civilization simultaneously wallowed in appalling brutality and soared to extraordinary heights. Stunning in scope, rich in telling detail, G. J. Meyer’s The Borgias is an indelible work sure to become the new standard on a family and a world that continue to enthrall.

    x

    In italiano:

    IMJrV0At


    CITAZIONE
    Emergono all'improvviso dall'oscurità della loro vita in Spagna e non solo conquistano il soglio papale, ma lo conquistano due volte. Per un tumultuoso cinquantennio, di volta in volta nelle vesti di pontefici, statisti, guerrieri, amanti, avventurieri politici ambiziosi e spregiudicati, occupano il centro della scena del grandioso, glorioso e insanguinato dramma del Rinascimento Italiano, epicentro dei giochi di potere in cui i re d'Europa e i condottieri italiani si affrontarono in una lotta senza quartiere. Sono passati cinque secoli dalla loro fine - fine che fu, se possibile, anche più improvvisa della loro fulminea ascesa - ma i Borgia continuano a rappresentare l'abisso d'abiezione in cui può precipitare l'essere umano: Rodrigo Borgia comprò il soglio e prostituì la Chiesa di Roma; Cesare vestì la porpora cardinalizia ancora adolescente, per diventare il tagliagole più temuto della sua epoca violenta; Lucrezia Borgia fu tanto scandalosamente immorale quanto bella ed affascinante. Protagonisti di repertorio delle più cupe cronache del Male europee, i loro nomi sono stati per lungo tempo sinonimo di turpitudine ineffabile. Ma I Borgia di questa tradizione leggendaria sono davvero esistiti? Meyer, basandosi su ricerche approfondite e attingendo a fonti tanto fondamentali quanto spesso ignorate, presenta i protagonisti veri in una prospettiva assolutamente nuova, liberandoli dalle incrostazioni del mito.

    amazon

    Edited by ‚dafne - 22/4/2017, 22:29
     
    Top
    .
  2. xcusemymonkey
     
    .

    User deleted


    La copertina non è che sia delle migliori contando che, forse, il tizio è vestito con abiti posteriori ai Borgia ma se è un buon libro... Credo sia una sorta di apologia o di demistificazione , che non è male nei limiti del giusto, ma boh...
     
    Top
    .
  3.  
    .
    Avatar

    Senior Member

    Group
    pope
    Posts
    37,198

    Status
    Anonymous
    Sì pare più una copertina dei Promessi Sposi... Comunque ho visto che l'autore ha scritto anche un libro sui Tudor, quindi sarà una specie di Hibbert ecco XD
     
    Top
    .
  4. reine noir
     
    .

    User deleted


    Magari è meglio di quanto pensiamo ! *ottimismo* Ho visto su internet che l'autore è uno scrittore per vari quotidiani americani molto importanti perciò possiamo pensare che sia una specie di Montanelli con la Storia d'Italia forse...!
     
    Top
    .
  5. xcusemymonkey
     
    .

    User deleted


    Anche sì, dite che lo tradurranno mai qui?
     
    Top
    .
  6. reine noir
     
    .

    User deleted


    Sono molto scettica su questa possibilità ! Credo che dovremmo accontentarci della lingua inglese..
     
    Top
    .
  7.  
    .
    Avatar

    Senior Member

    Group
    pope
    Posts
    37,198

    Status
    Anonymous
    CITAZIONE
    For the most part though, Meyer's writing is fluid and provides a very easy read. As I was reading, it really didn't feel like a non fiction book to me. But then, I have read much heavier tomes than this. Meyers writing is so fluid that at times it really did read like a novel to me, but at the same time I could really see the amount of research that he did into his work. His writing style really did make the story of the Borgia family - from Alonso De Borja right up until the fantastic Saint Francis Borgia - utterly accessible. Easy reading, and doesn't overload the reader with too much politics - although given the era, politics is really a given.

    tutta su loyaltybindsme!



    Un passo su Lucrezia:
    CITAZIONE
    Though the years ahead would be heavy with dark events, and though she was quite human enough to be changed by the misfortunes that befell her, Lucrezia would mature and improve rather than harden with the years. If by the end of her life not a great deal would remain of the fun-loving child-bride she had been when first married, neither would she bear the slightest resemblance to the monstrous Lucrezia of legend.

    Uno sull'Italia:
    CITAZIONE
    Misrule and instability thus formed the dark underside of the Italian Renaissance, with almost every regime recurrently under threat from internal as well as external enemies. It was far from uncommon, and at times was almost commonplace, for the lords of Italy’s cities to be bloodily overthrown—often by their own kinsmen, with brother killing brother either to gain or to retain power. Men who had become rulers through violence could find little grounds for complaint, and often nowhere to appeal, when their turn came to be violently overthrown. Might made right: this became a fact of life and was the one utterly inglorious element in Renaissance Italy’s otherwise magnificent heritage. Betrayal and murder became endemic even at the most exalted levels of society, even within the greatest families. This was the world in which the Borjas of Valencia had to learn to make their way.


    Edited by ‚dafne - 6/11/2014, 22:30
     
    Top
    .
  8. xcusemymonkey
     
    .

    User deleted


    CITAZIONE
    The Family Behind the Legacy: G.J. Meyer’s The Borgias

    From the acclaimed author of The Tudors and A World Undone, comes a history of one of the most notorious dynasties the world has known. Below is an excerpt from G.J. Meyer's The Borgias: The Hidden History.

    The Borgias: The Hidden History by G.J. Meyer

    A Most Improbable Pope

    It is the third of April, and springtime is in full force.

    We are in Rome, which in this year of 1455 is neither the glorious world capital it had been under the emperors of old nor the great city it will become once again in a few generations. Instead it is a dilapidated backwater of thirty or perhaps forty thousand souls.

    At the Vatican, dominated by the thousand-year-old and slowly disintegrating St. Peter’s Basilica, the cardinals are assembling. They are doing so because ten days have passed since the death of Pope Nicholas V. Of “apoplexy,” the attending physicians have declared, thereby revealing that they haven’t the faintest idea of what it was that caused him to grow feebler week after week until finally, aged only fifty-seven, he himself announced that his end was at hand.

    The death of this particular pontiff at this particular time is a deeply worrisome thing. As for the fact that the time has come to elect his successor—it is so snarled up in difficulties and dangers as to scarcely bear thinking about.

    Officially and as usual, the first nine days after the pope’s death were reserved for the obsequies with which deceased pontiffs are launched into the afterlife: one requiem mass per day, each presided over by a different cardinal. But in fact, and inevitably, the days and the nights as well have been filled with backstairs politicking, mainly to see who can put together the most potent blocs of votes. In the midst of all this, Nicholas’s wizened little body has been sealed up in the traditional three coffins, one of cypress inside another of lead inside still another of fine-grained and polished elm. It was then laid to rest in the crypt under the basilica, a structure so alarmingly decrepit that in the last few years of the pope’s reign 2,500 cartloads of stone had been stripped from the Colosseum and hauled across the Tiber for use in shoring it up.

    By the time the last Ite, missa est brought the last mass to an end, the windows of one wing of the pontifical palace were boarded up in the customary way. Austere little cells, each containing a cot, a stool, and a small table, have been hammered together inside. The fifteen available cardinals (six others are too far from Rome to attend) are now reporting for duty. As they file inside, the doors are bolted behind them. Guards are posted, and the conclave of 1455 is formally in session.

    Deprived of natural light, the cardinals are dependent on candles and oil lamps for illumination. With no ventilation and wood fires the only source of morning warmth, the air they breathe will soon be foul. But conclaves are not supposed to be pleasant. Physical discomfort long ago proved its value. It encourages the princes of the Church to get on with their business, announce the results, and go home.

    Every part of the process is governed by customs that have evolved over a millennium and a half. At various times the choosing of popes has been under the control of Roman emperors, Byzantine emperors, and Holy Roman emperors from beyond the Alps. Sometimes popes have been able to nominate their successors, and there have been periods when no one would dare take the throne without the approval of the clergy—even the people—of Rome. But in 1059 a papal decree conferred the right of election on the College of Cardinals. Eighty years later another decree gave that right to the cardinals exclusively, meaning that no further approvals were needed once the Sacred College had made its choice. Forty years after that, a two-thirds majority of votes cast became necessary for election.

    With that, the pattern was set. Though there have been other changes—an attempt, for example, to force fast action by reducing the cardinals’ rations if they fail to reach a decision within three days and reducing them again if a pope has not been elected after five—the essential rules could hardly be simpler. Whoever can get the votes of ten of the men now locked together inside the palace will assume the full powers of the papacy from the moment of his election. He will do so even if the whole outside world disapproves.

    Simple rules are no assurance of an easy outcome, however. Choosing a pope is always a complicated affair, because much is always at stake and so many competing forces invariably come into play. Things rarely go smoothly. As the cardinals settle into their cubicles and begin to talk among themselves, they know that this election is unlikely to be an exception.

    Not that Nicholas has left them with a mess. To the contrary, he was in no way a bad or even a careless pope. By the standards of the time he was a good one. Anyone comparing him with his immediate predecessors might find reason to call him an almost great one. Raised in humble circumstances in northwestern Italy, he had risen in the Church purely on the basis of merit—first as one of the leading humanist scholars of his time, then through success as a diplomat. His election was a fluke; he became a cardinal only a few months before the conclave that made him pope, and it never could have happened if the most powerful factions in the College of Cardinals had not deadlocked. But the eight years of his reign proved to be rich in achievement and free of scandal. He contributed greatly to bringing peace and a measure of stability not only to Italy but to Germany as well, ended a last outbreak of schism, found honest ways to replenish the Vatican’s treasury, and resumed the oft-interrupted process of trying to restore the decayed city of Rome to its lost splendor.

    xx
     
    Top
    .
  9.  
    .
    Avatar

    Senior Member

    Group
    pope
    Posts
    37,198

    Status
    Anonymous

    Scribd

     
    Top
    .
  10. marie.
     
    .

    User deleted


    CITAZIONE
    According to G.J. Meyer, author of “The Borgias: The Hidden History,” thus was born the legend of Lucrezia as an incestuous vixen.

    Meyer notes that at the time of her final separation from Giovanni, she was a fun-loving 17-year-old. He also points out that many of the long-accepted stories about the clan’s unmitigated evil were creations of their worst enemies, unsupported by fact.

    Podcast
     
    Top
    .
9 replies since 27/12/2012, 00:02   258 views
  Share  
.
Top
Top